[Bill Carson]

Originally Posted by Jack_

As I've said many times before on this forum - the large majority of the voting public are illogical and deluded. They continuously evict entertaining housemates that contribute heavily each year, and we are left with the dullest of dull as a result. This leads to undeserving winners [Rachel Rice being a prime example] and lacklustre final weeks. They really don't have a clue generally, thankfully however they for once this year they crowned the most entertaining housemate the winner - and with any luck this will finally break their delusional trend, but somehow I doubt it.

To be quite honest, housemates nominating her is a prime example as to why she was a good housemate. It is these housemates that annoy the others that should be kept for entertainment value. You know, if people thought a bit more logically we'd have a lot more to discuss and watch, after all that is what this show is all about. Big Brother thrives on discussion and debate, if housemates that sparked these debates didn't exist, we would have very little to discuss - and ultimately the show would fall flat on its face. Sadly, most years, due to the terrible voting patterns, we are often indeed left with very little to discuss towards the end. It really doesn't make sense.

As for the last thing, I do it because each year I become increasingly annoyed with the fact that very few people seem to recognise this. They vote with their hearts and not their heads, which in a show like Big Brother does not work. If most people stopped judging the housemates as people and started judging them as housemates, and then voted accordingly, we would have a much greater show with lots more to talk about.

This is a very valid point in a succinctly worded post,sadly it will be ignored by the automatons that can't seem to grasp the big picture.....every season.