[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

The only person he killed outside of self-defence was a white sex offender who was using the N-word. So maybe it really wasn't about race after all.

https://theothermccain.com/2020/08/2...-shoot-me-n-r/

To say he was targetting protestors is to act as if peaceful protesters are the same as rioters, which is an insult to protesters.

Oh drop it, it's not self defense if you kill someone and then other people try to apprehend you. Also your source is just plain dubious when a quick google search shows that no respected publication or platform is covering this 'story'.

I know you desperately want to paint this story a certain way but if you're relying on bad sources to push a certain narrative then you're destined to be in the wrong. The Right Wing are desperate to venerate this murderer and it's gross. The victim's past is irrelevant, what the victim said is irrelevant. You don't shoot people in the face and murder them and none of the details that the right bang on about change the facts of the case.

[LeatherTrumpet]

it wasnt graphic it was blurred out

you didnt see anything

[Liam-]

Alex Jones, why am I not surprised

[Tom4784]

Ah Alex Jones, the man who made targets out of grieving parents who had lost their children in an elementary school shooting by making up a conspiracy theory to make crazies harrass those poor people. He is a voice that must surely be believed.

[LeatherTrumpet]

The member of the “People’s Revolution Movement” who had his bicep blown off in Konesha two nights ago may have just helped Kyle Rittenhouse’s claim of self-defense. If you aren’t familar with the details, Gaige Grosskreutz charged with a pistol at Rittenhouse after he was being beaten on the ground by another man who subsequently shot and killed. New evidence also shows that someone fired at Rittenhouse first during the first altercation in which a third man was shot in the head. He was then chased down the street where he encountered Grosskreutz.

Now, a friend claims that Grosskreutz regrets not shooting and killing Rittenhouse, going so far as to say he wanted to empty “the entire mag into him.”

While this statement may or may not be admissible in court, it does bolster Rittenhouse’s claim that he rightfully feared for his life. It will also be something the police have to take into account during their investigation. Rittenhouse, according to the video, was not the aggressor in either location where shooting took place. In the first instance, a man charged him, throwing something at him while clearly posing a threat. That was the first discharge of the weapon. The mob then chased him down the street. After stumbling, he was hit with a skateboard and discharged his weapon several times again, killing the man trying to assault him. It was then that Grosskreutz was videoed running at Rittenhouse with a pistol in his hand. The final shot was fired at that point, blowing Grosskreutz’s bicep up in what has now become a viral video.

At the end of the day, I see noway that a 1st degree murder charge stands here. Every piece of evidence says this was self-defense. And while it may be correct to say this 17 year old shouldn’t have been there armed with a gun, the right stop others from harming or killing you doesn’t go out the window over concerns of vanity. Regardless of why he was there, Rittenhouse had a right to shoot those attacking him. Whether this will serve as a lesson for future “protesters,” we’ll see. It’s a shame something like this had to happen for people to realize how dangerous these riots are getting. This entire ordeal is a gross failure of state and local officials who had the power to prevent the carnage and destruction. If police aren’t allowed to do their jobs and anarchy reigns, people are going to get killed. It was inevitable and it will happen again unless things change.

https://www.redstate.com/bonchie/202...-teen-shooter/

[Liam-]

The guy who had his arm blown off was the 3rd person the lunatic shot and Americans have the right to shoot people if they’re being shot at, so yes, I’m not surprised he wished he shot him after he shot someone else and before he got his arm blown off, seems quite rational thinking actually, if he had shot the murderer, he wouldn’t have been shot himself, that’s sensible

[LeatherTrumpet]

Originally Posted by Liam-

The guy who had his arm blown off was the 3rd person the lunatic shot and Americans have the right to shoot people if they’re being shot at, so yes, I’m not surprised he wished he shot him after he shot someone else and before he got his arm blown off, seems quite rational thinking actually, if he had shot the murderer, he wouldn’t have been shot himself, that’s sensible

From what we know so far he charged at the young boy pointing a handgun at him

so he is lucky to get away with a minor wound

[Liam-]

He was trying to disarm a murderer using his protected liberties, he was a very Good Samaritan trying to help keep his fellow citizens safe and paid the price at the hands of a murderous, radicalised militant, he’s very lucky to have escaped alive, bless him

He showed great restraint in the face of an imminent threat to his life, he should be rewarded for his bravery

[LeatherTrumpet]

Originally Posted by liam-

he was trying to disarm a murderer using his protected liberties, he was a very good samaritan trying to help keep his fellow citizens safe and paid the price at the hands of a murderous, radicalised militant, he’s very lucky to have escaped alive, bless him

he is a rioter and a member of a communist organisation

[Liam-]

He’s a hero who put his life on the line to try and stop a vicious murder from taking any more lives, if a cop did that they’d get some sort of medal, he should be honoured somehow

[LeatherTrumpet]

Originally Posted by Liam-

He’s a hero who put his life on the line to try and stop a vicious murder from taking any more lives, if a cop did that they’d get some sort of medal, he should be honoured somehow

too far

[LeatherTrumpet]

Originally Posted by Liam-

He’s a hero who put his life on the line to try and stop a vicious murder from taking any more lives, if a cop did that they’d get some sort of medal, he should be honoured somehow

here you can watch the video of your "Hero" charging WITH A HANDGUN at a 17 year old boy who has been knocked on the floor

The young boy defends himself as best he can



self- defense

end of

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...wounded-1.html

[Nicky91]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

here you can watch the video of your "Hero" charging WITH A HANDGUN at a 17 year old boy who has been knocked on the floor

The young boy defends himself as best he can



self- defense

end of

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...wounded-1.html

no, it is not self-defense

[LeatherTrumpet]

Originally Posted by Nicky91

no, it is not self-defense

its the very definition

he was being attacked by a murderous criminal mob

[Denver]

Its nit self defense if you went with the intention to kill

[Liam-]

A 17 year old double murderer LT, he was using is liberties to attempt to disarm a double murderer, it’s not self defence to kill someone trying to disarm you after murdering two people

End of

[Liberty4eva]

Originally Posted by Liam-

A 17 year old double murderer LT, he was using is liberties to attempt to disarm a double murderer, it’s not self defence to kill someone trying to disarm you after murdering two people

End of

Do you really think their only goal was to disarm him? Like they would have taken his gun and that would have been that. Anyone with half a brain knows that they would have disarmed him and then beaten him to within an inch of his life. When the kid tripped and was on the ground, at that point he really didn't have a choice.

[Liam-]

When 12 year old are shot while playing with toy guns, they’re seen as criminals, when 17 year olds murder and injure multiple people with actual guns, they’re seen as kids, enough of the bull**** honestly.

[Liam-]

Except, they’ve never killed anybody, try again

[LeatherTrumpet]

Originally Posted by Liam-

Except, they’ve never killed anybody, try again

no because they came up against someone who fought back to their lawless criminality and anarchy and id imagine this will continue until these agitators are jailed en masse

[Liam-]

No, because they’re not murderers, if they were the double murderer would have been dead as well, this hero had the chance to take deadly measures to protect himself and he chose not to, he chose to put his life at risk instead.

You’re right though, there probably will be more murderous right wingers killing people for no reason, they’re the most dangerous people in the USA right now, I hope everyone stays aware and safe.

[LeatherTrumpet]

[Denver]

Antifa is just a made up name to take away from the president being a benefactor in white supremacist groups

[Nicky91]

Originally Posted by Denver

Antifa is just a made up name to take away from the president being a benefactor in white supremacist groups

which i wonder, i guess Donnie still gets those votes from those KKK members this years elections too

[LeatherTrumpet]

Originally Posted by Nicky91

which i wonder, i guess Donnie still gets those votes from those KKK members this years elections too

well with approximately 3,000 Klan members in the USA he isnt going to get too far with that