1965 Little Richard did not pay Jimi Hendrix for 5 weeks

[arista]

Jimi spent a few months touring
with the Bigger Star
back then using the name Maurice James


New Large Book
by Janie Hendrix and John McDermott

https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/41JwI+pWSZL._SY344_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg
On Amazon UK
£30:89
Quality Made Large Book
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Jimi-Janie-Hendrix/dp/1797220012/ref=asc_df_1797220012/?tag=googshopuk-21&linkCode=df0&hvadid=570383611607&hvpos=&hvnetw=g&hvrand=4513811011162961150&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqmt=&hvdev=c&hvdvcmdl=&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=1006565&hvtargid=pla-1695974645687&psc=1&th=1&psc=1


Page 64.


Of course to Little Richard,
Jimi (Maurice James)
was a slick Guitar player
that he could rip off.


Good On Jimi
leaving that live show performing.

By late 1966 he was recording in London.

[Alf]

Little Richard did more for Jimi by being a big influence in his career.

[arista]

Little Richard did more for Jimi by being a big influence in his career.

Sure but be fair
if you were working hard,
for 5 weeks at that time,
you would expect some pay.

[UserSince2005]

black on black crimes make me sick. if you cant trust your brothers who can you trust?

[Beso]

It would only have went on drugs.

[arista]

black on black crimes make me sick. if you cant trust your brothers who can you trust?

Yes,
Real Bad in 1965
ripping off a
young cool Guitar player
working hard in a big band.

[arista]

It would only have went on drugs.


Not True,
He has to Eat
and stay clean.

[arista]

Cheaper at Amazon UK


https://twitter.com/JimiHendrix/status/1686115768113721344