So you fell for BB's manipulation then?
 

Just wondering?

If you don't know what I'm talking about then you probably did.

Do enlighten us, I'm sure we'd be forever Grateful.

You mean Hazel looking bad and getting evicted? I didn't but yes you're right

what you talking about?

It's just dribble lol

Oh no it's a cryptic one from the smartarse pullout section !

But seriously, give us a clue LBBU ?

What I find even more unbelievable than that is that they have turned it into a 10 week series when it was suppose to be 8 to 9 weeks.

BB are out to try and get Gina or Dexter evicted.

You know what she's on about ?

Please enlighten us.

1. I think she's on about Hazel and Gina looking bad on the highlights tonight.

2. Having another round of nominations, and this week being the penultimate week when it was initially suppose to be the last week, I reckon they're out to try and get rid of Gina or Dexter before the final so it's easier for Sam to win, I wouldn't be surprised if they do a double and get two for the price of one.

As of next week the series has lasted 9 weeks.

Why might they want to do that ?

No because Callum went week 7, Hazel went week 8, and this week is week 9.

Some sort of so called "happy ending" with "the nice deaf kid wins in a nasty Big Brother and has gone through a lot of hardship to get his victory".

Of course the papers will do it better than I did but it will be something along those lines.

Next Thursday is 9 weeks from Launch: part 1. The final will be 9 weeks and 4 days into the series.

Yesterday you said they wouldn't want Sam as winner because it would affect ratings for the next series because he's dull? :joker:

Now you're saying they're manipulating the show to make Sam win for a happy ending?

:hugesmile:

Thanks yeah tbh I could believe it.
Hope it's wrong though !

Blimey sat drinking lager, sleeping all day, saying nothing and picking up £100K.
Can't get much more hardship than all that !

I never said it like that, what I did say was I think they are making a stupid move as dull winners normally affect the ratings for the next series for the worst.

But they are trying to give Sam the win as his two rivals for the crown are being given really bad edits for the public while Sam's being given the saintly edit.

I mean just look at all the polls? Sam has a lot of fans and not really many haters at all, the most that would vote him out on a vote to evict is 15% I reckon if we're lucky.

I know, it's such hard work.:joker:

sounds like a thread accusing other fans of being stupid to me.
isnt this against the rules?

This. I'm actually offended

yes and you're better than us all, OP. Have a wowwipop and try not to wet the bed.

Gina's had a bad edit because she's a bitch, there's no way you could edit that nicely without changing facts. Dexter hasn't been edited as anything, he's not featured much for a week or so. Sam, barely featured but when he is he's nice, because he's nice.

What do you want BB to do? They honestly don't give a fig about winners.

You have no evidence to back up your claim that the winners have an effect on the following series ratings. The winner is the last 15 minutes of the show, doesn't change a 3 month series from good or bad.

Im going to report the thread as it is offensive i suggest others do the same.

You're cool.

Give over ?