[arista]

Originally Posted by MTVN

How has she gone this long without doing an interview did becoming the presidential nominee in unprecedented fashion a few weeks back not warrant an interview?

Yes,
and this was not her alone.
And not live.


Terrible soft interview

[Liam-]

Only somebody that didn’t actually watch it or is completely delusional would call that a soft interview

[arista]

Originally Posted by Liam-

Only somebody that didn’t actually watch it or is completely delusional would call that a soft interview

You are so wrong

Journalists who watched it all
said it was a Soft Interview

[bots]

it really wasn't a soft interview. They were both asked the questions that trump world wanted to be asked. What you really mean is that she answered the questions well

[arista]

Should have done it Live.
That stinks


Dana Bash is a soft interviewer


CNN HD Failed

[Liam-]

You’re exhausting

[bots]

Arista hates women, so it's really no surprise

[arista]

It is Very Likely
she can become President Harris,
On November the 5th 2024.

So it is important that the World can see her in a
Proper interview without Walz by her side.

[Sticks]

Originally Posted by arista

It is Very Likely
she can become President Harris,
On November the 5th 2024.

So it is important that the World can see her in a
Proper interview without Walz by her side.

No chance

All the women of America are now lining up to vote to for that gorgeous hunk of a guy, Trump to save him from that brazen hussy, another women, who all women hate, as she is another women.

Remember what Big Brother taught us, Women hate other Women

I would say Trump has it in the bag, but the UNDemocrats are expected to cheat like they did in 2020 and steal the election.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Sticks

No chance

All the women of America are now lining up to vote to for that gorgeous hunk of a guy, Trump to save him from that brazen hussy, another women, who all women hate, as she is another women.

Remember what Big Brother taught us, Women hate other Women

I would say Trump has it in the bag, but the UNDemocrats are expected to cheat like they did in 2020 and steal the election.

Sure many Women are voting Trump.

But More Younger Women are backing Harris.

Extra Police will be at the Election
to stop any fights.

[arista]

Dana pushed a question,
Walz on his Army Record.

He said he misspoke.


The whole interview was only 35mins

[Liam-]

This is why she shouldn’t pander to the media who think they are the most important factor in the election

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Liam-

Twitter Link

This is why she shouldn’t pander to the media who think they are the most important factor in the election

only interview after 30 days a softball with far left CNN with babysitter false valour discredited liar side kick In case she misread autocue



you could not make it up

[Maru]

I couldn't finish the interview when I initially saw it. Hub had the same reaction when watching on his own. We watched lighter coverage later on. Now I'm listening to it with some commentary to see if I can actually get through it. Funny enough, I think they're watching a version with much less of the VP. I'm not sure if that means CNN is uploading clips with less of him intervening, but it's interesting that I noted I find it much more watchable without him chiming in. I did not understand what he added. "Oh, I agree with everything she said just now! (repeats things) We share the same values!" (big smiles from Kamala) That was so pointless. She should've just done it alone, imo, and even if she bombed it a bit, it could easily be blamed on nervousness in some part if she can make up with better interviews and answering questions more directly. It would've been good for getting her to the debates to hash out all her weak points now and not wait until she's in front of Trump.

[bots]

After the gop convention Trump and Vance did an interview together. It's pretty standard after the convention

[Alf]

Where on God's Green Earth is the current so called President, Biden. Is he still sleeping on the beach?

[Crimson Dynamo]

[QUOTE=Alf;11500445]Where on God's Green Earth is the current so called President, Biden. Is he still sleeping on the beach?[/QUO

Chilling

[Kate!]

Harris is not strong enough to be President. Much as I am not overly fond of Trump, he knows what he's doing.

[Maru]

Originally Posted by bots

After the gop convention Trump and Vance did an interview together. It's pretty standard after the convention

Trump's not being introduced to the people for the first time. It's not standard for candidates to be introduced as a pair. Trump was introducing his VP, whereas Trump had been running "as Trump" for quite some time before then.

[Alf]

Originally Posted by Sticks

No chance

All the women of America are now lining up to vote to for that gorgeous hunk of a guy, Trump to save him from that brazen hussy, another women, who all women hate, as she is another women.

Remember what Big Brother taught us, Women hate other Women

I would say Trump has it in the bag, but the UNDemocrats are expected to cheat like they did in 2020 and steal the election.

Get em, Donald

[Maru]

Originally Posted by Kate!

Harris is not strong enough to be President. Much as I am not overly fond of Trump, he knows what he's doing.

She will to have her party do the heavy lifting I think as she's running more to appeal to the emotions of the voter rather than show she makes good decisions based on proven policy. The policy/promises she's recently introduced, clearly are meant to appeal to moderates, seemingly come out of no where given the platform she's been a large part of (allegedly) for at least the past 4 years.

We all suspect Biden hasn't been running the WH and so it's hard to put down confidently who is really actually making the policy decisions there and especially if she can even be blamed for any of it. (The GOP is using their own insistence against them that *she* had been running more than we know in the WH against them, which is odd But it's proper given they are trying to give that impression.. )

But for me, it really says a lot about how Democrats actually interpret their own political prowess when they have gone well out of their way to defend essentially what is a weaker leadership. They're relying too heavily on a default vote of "Never Trump", which may still work, based on the rest being a good enough facade to get the swing voter comfortable enough to even vote for Kamala. She hasn't had enough time to build a proper campaign, so in all fairness to her, a good portion of that may not even be her fault. However, Biden should not have ran in the first place and a proper candidate should've been selected. (It would not have been her, obviously...)

Put another way, I would not answer an official poll of any kind if I were asked about her. I have to wonder how many others might think the same? How can they ask about a post-primary candidate's performance whom we never had a chance to get comfortable enough to cast a vote for? Some voters might really take issue with that, to see her name on the Presidential ticket that wasn't even part of the official process. Biden may not have been all there (he isn't dead) and yet he received millions of votes, now invalidated by a completely political appointment. It presents a real hiccup, I think, but it really all comes down to the "How much can you stomach Trump?".

As for the party, the Democrats seemingly reintroduce themselves every 4 years as a party of "It's fine", where the past 4 years didn't really matter all that much and it's still the last President's fault who was part of the opposition party. It's too heavily based on invalidating the past, whether it's to be rid of it, to rewrite it or overwrite past mistakes. "Let's just get rid of all that", Kamala's favorite catchphrase. Not my example of a person who actually has their ear to the ground and knows what they are doing. "Oh this is not working how we want it to, let's get rid of it". With no thought put into why things were made the way they were... "We will have a Republican in our cabinet" won't fool the voter, imo, if they have no examples of where they take what works from other platforms and especially where the party is so arrogant to never learn from their own mistakes... they are asking a lot of the voter to ask them to keep participating in their experiments.

So when Trump is gone, what are they going to run with? Both parties will be in trouble once he is out. Democrats can't keep inventing crazy policies without a far right boogie man to distract the voter from analyzing the details. (They'll look for a new one though... I still remember how they ran against McCain before he became their ally.. and he's a moderate). And the GOP had better come up with someone who can keep their base above room temperature, because that's been their primary issue since Obama. The GOP is begging to be remade at this point and I hope it's more moderate because while a good part of the country loves being the Wild West, there's more room than ever for a mindset where people have taken the time to note both party's lack of performance and are less swayed by fictionalized versions of recent history and promises based on a short-term political memory... which has gotten increasingly longer with the modern Internet.

[bots]

its all going to be about turn out. Which voters are energised to vote. The dems now have a figurehead that is not a geriatric and that may be what makes the difference in the end

[Maru]

Originally Posted by bots

its all going to be about turn out. Which voters are energised to vote. The dems now have a figurehead that is not a geriatric and that may be what makes the difference in the end

Agree 100%. I'm really curious how this general is going to perform compared the past several. There's been a decline in who votes (in general). I have been tuned out as well but still dragging myself to primaries/generals/run offs out of literal obligation...

[arista]

She will be President Harris

[Crimson Dynamo]

Youtube video