[Santa Goth]

Originally Posted by Soldier Boy

People have been doing so for years...

They were shouted down by angry people with an agenda and told to shut up because there were no studies and no evidence...

...so a massive study was done and evidence complied...

......and those same people got very VERY angry about that, too, and are attempting to dismiss it as propaganda. Which was entirely predictable, tbh. When people say "you have no evidence of this!" they generally do not want to actually see any evidence. They want the evidence to not exist.

That's definitely Human nature to be like the BIB, going by other topics in the past where some people can't accept that their perception might be wrong about the particular topic.

I've experienced this on the Internet, and a couple of times irl.

[Cherie Christmas]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

Just to clarify.

I don't know how accurate or not The Cass Report is or isn't, but if it's even remotely accurate, then it should've been told to society sooner imo.

well NHS England and NHS Scotland have stopped prescribing puberty blockers because the long term effects are now known, so I think that is pretty accurate tbf

[Christmas Dynamo]

When people say "you have no evidence of this!" they generally do not want to actually see any evidence. They want the evidence to not exist.

lol like this Green eejit Patrick Harvie...


https://x.com/staylorish/status/1782327879490994390

[Santa Goth]

Originally Posted by Cherie

well NHS England and NHS Scotland have stopped prescribing puberty blockers because the long term effects are now known, so I think that is pretty accurate tbf

It definitely makes a strong case against the Puberty Blockers, I'll definitely say that.

[Quantum Bauble]

Originally Posted by Cherie

well NHS England and NHS Scotland have stopped prescribing puberty blockers because the long term effects are now known, so I think that is pretty accurate tbf

It's a well sourced, evidenced and backed up piece of academic literature from respected professional and you have 20-year-old shelf stackers dismissing it like it's some sort of opinion piece in a right wing magazine. And certain media outlets who should know better playing along to pander to an audience. The world really is descending into anti-intellectual nonsense.

I genuinely 100% blame social media.

[bots]

It's interesting, everything these days is done to increase social engagement, and X is right up there in being a culprit. However, with the US election coming up, studies have been done and less than 2% of american voters actually read X, so all their social engagement and hysterics means pretty much f all in the scheme of things.

Where things gain traction is when they hit the mainstream

[Quantum Bauble]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

It's interesting, everything these days is done to increase social engagement, and X is right up there in being a culprit. However, with the US election coming up, studies have been done and less than 2% of american voters actually read X, so all their social engagement and hysterics means pretty much f all in the scheme of things.

Where things gain traction is when they hit the mainstream

It's a lot more complicated than that - people don't have to be ON social media to be affected by the tides of social media. I think of it like an expressway... it allows all sorts of ideas to spread, at unprecedented speed. Those ideas then filter outwards from that 2% into the general population. If you keep your eye on things like Twitter and more particularly things like Reddit, you'll see tomorrow's news years in advance. For example, things like Andrew Tate, Redpill, etc. had been floating around online for literal YEARS before they hit the mainstream. And flat earthers, QAnon, Trump Truthism, extreme environmentalism, gender ideology, etc... you can see it all simmering away in these sorts of channels long in advance of it boiling over into general public consumption.

It's why shows like South Park "seem to have" predicted all sorts of issues in episodes dating back to a year+ before things start to enter the mainstream consciousness. They're not really predicting things. They just have their eyes on the right places.

The effect is that by the time things hit the mainstream media it's already FAR too late. Any reasonable counter-narrative is already on the back foot. The tendrils are already out there. Stonewall and Mermaids was imbedded in the ears of CEO's and govt. officials before 90% of the population knew what a "gender identity" was.

[Christmas Dynamo]

Proof that Childline (@NSPCC) have been assisting Mermaids to develop a
webchat system, to enable them to communicate with vulnerable children.


Childline are ideologically captured and pose a safeguarding risk to children.



https://x.com/JamesEsses/status/1779173595060560240

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

Proof that Childline (@NSPCC) have been assisting Mermaids to develop a
webchat system, to enable them to communicate with vulnerable children.


Childline are ideologically captured and pose a safeguarding risk to children.



https://x.com/JamesEsses/status/1779173595060560240

The Childline founder knew all about Jimmy SaVILE’s ‘activities’ for years and turned a blind eye !





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Christmas Dynamo]

It's all coming out now ...

"NSPCC pushed trans ideology on children, whistleblower claims"

"An ex-volunteer said the charity ran sessions on pronouns for under-11s which
she felt was a clear safeguarding risk"

Yet another reason we need a full public inquiry into gender ideology



https://x.com/GoodwinMJ/status/1782462563847987594

Julia Marshall, 62, who had volunteered with the organisation for more than
30 years, warned that it had been “completely captured” by Stonewall, the
LGBT lobbying group.

She claimed that, along with other school volunteers, she was told to ask
primary school-age children their pronouns when delivering assemblies and
workshops.

Marshall, an ex-police officer and mother-of-three, said that volunteers were
put under pressure to affirm children’s choices of gender, even where it had
nothing to do with protecting them against physical and sexual abuse.

She claimed that she was ostracised for speaking out against the apparent
shift in direction.

She had been fundraising for the NSPCC since the early 1990s, but in 2012
she became a regular school visitor, helping to deliver the “Speak Out, Stay
Safe” message. The campaign was aimed at empowering children to
recognise and report instances of abuse.

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/3...4bc593f1de8272

[Christmas Dynamo]

JK Rowling

'Those still defending the sterilisation and mutilation of children are exposing
themselves daily... it was never about the children for them... The kids were
just collateral damage in a culture war we were told was not actually real.'

[Christmas Dynamo]

The Cass Review looked at the medical evidence on suicide risk and concluded:

“It has been suggested that hormone treatment reduces the elevated risk of
death by suicide in this population but the evidence found did not support this
conclusion.”



https://x.com/SexMattersOrg/status/1788924268920607009

[Quantum Bauble]

Evidence is strong that the only reason for reduced suicidality post-gender reassignment (with or without hormones) is catharsis. Suicidality tends to return within 5 years. The argument oft given is that this is because the person is still experiencing persecution and unacceptance -- but that's largely just because people don't understand what catharsis is and how it works, so they don't understand why someone would seem better/happier for years and then have their mental health decline again. It's literally just time and diminishing returns.

[Christmas Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Soldier Boy

Evidence is strong that the only reason for reduced suicidality post-gender reassignment (with or without hormones) is catharsis. Suicidality tends to return within 5 years. The argument oft given is that this is because the person is still experiencing persecution and unacceptance -- but that's largely just because people don't understand what catharsis is and how it works, so they don't understand why someone would seem better/happier for years and then have their mental health decline again. It's literally just time and diminishing returns.

Ruth Hunt of @stonewalluk promoting puberty blockers with the suicide myth in 2019.

“Suddenly Michael who has been presenting as Sarah is being forced to go through puberty… That’s where you see half of young people commit suicide.”

short video here: https://x.com/SexMattersOrg/status/1788932363398910373

shameless pompous charlatan

[Christmas Dynamo]

The below slack (type of private message platform) message about Beira's
Place - @jk_rowling's sexual violence support service - was sent by a staff
member at Edinburgh Rape Crisis Centre.

Disgusting that someone working for a rape crisis centre was angered by
female victims being offered same sex care.

[Christmas Dynamo]

The worst of it is that AB is female but identifies as ‘non-binary’.

Judge (p94): “Once again, we make the point that AB worked in a Rape Crisis Centre. It is
absolutely clear that they knew that changing their name to a name which sounded male
was going to cause difficulties.”

[Christmas Dynamo]

More progress in the USA

"Transition affirmation is not proven to be safe or effective long term. It does
not reduce suicides. It does not repair mental health issues or trauma." Dr.
Andre Van Mol of ACPeds.

Youtube video

[Christmas Dynamo]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

More progress in the USA

"Transition affirmation is not proven to be safe or effective long term. It does
not reduce suicides. It does not repair mental health issues or trauma." Dr.
Andre Van Mol of ACPeds.

Youtube video

Good now that Elon has retweeted this video

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1799282802103341466

because YouTube have been doing their level best to suppress the view on Youtubes

Thank goodness for X