 |
|
| Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
| Reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
15-11-2013, 05:22 PM
|
#1 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Fecking Labour saying he should not go?
Stupid Labour we are in Charge of the Commonwealth summit it was set up years ago. Today many mothers wanted to show photos of their lost Child or husband. But thats not our problem. Sure India and Canada did not send their leaders but other ministers from those nations are there. http://www.theguardian.com/politics/...otesters-tamil Ref: SkyNewsHD and Radio 5 Last edited by arista; 15-11-2013 at 05:32 PM. |
|||
|
 Reply With Quote
|
|
18-11-2013, 07:49 PM
|
#2 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Just on Ch4News
in 2009 New Labour agreed to attend the 2013 Summit. Typical of the Labour Leader to forget what his party said back in 2009. |
|||
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
|
18-11-2013, 08:09 PM
|
#3 | |||
|
||||
|
שטח זה להשכרה
|
It's the Commonwealth, how could we not attend? Labour being obtuse for the sake of it.
|
|||
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
|
18-11-2013, 08:10 PM
|
#4 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Bang On Right Livia |
|||
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
|
18-11-2013, 08:10 PM
|
#5 | |||
|
||||
|
Z
|
 Why would we not send our PM? Bizarre logic
|
|||
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
|
18-11-2013, 08:18 PM
|
#6 | |||
|
||||
|
All hail the Moyesiah
|
Sri Lanka maybe shouldnt have been allowed to host it but like has been said that decision was made back in 09, and seeing as that can't be changed now Cameron can achieve more through attending than by boycotting
|
|||
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
| Reply |
|
|
PM David Cameron in Sri Lanka Commonwealth Summit
Linear Mode
