[ChristmasNeeve]

“no bad review policy” that's surely not legal



A couple have claimed they received a £100 (€124) fine from a UK hotel after leaving an online review describing it as a “filthy, stinking hovel”.
Tony and Jan Jenkinson said they were charged the money after leaving highly critical comments about the Broadway Hotel in Blackpool on TripAdvisor.
They stopped at the hotel on their way to Oxford, paying £36 (€45) for a night in a double room.

After encountering problems with the room, Mr Jenkinson to posted a negative review on August 30 in which he branded the hotel a “filthy, dirty, rotten, stinking hovel”.
“Couldn’t believe the state of the room,” the review reads. “If you are offered this place to stay for a fortnight for 10p, you are being robbed.”
The Jenkinsons said they then discovered the £100 charge on their credit card statement a few days later.

When they queried the charge, they were told it was incurred under a “no bad review policy” included in the hotel’s terms and conditions.
The policy said: “Despite the fact that repeat customers and couples love our hotel, your friends and family may not. For every bad review left on any website, the group organiser will be charged a maximum £100 per review.”
The couple, from Whitehaven in Cumbria, are attempting to recoup the money through their credit card company.
They complained to Cumbria trading standards officials, who have passed the matter to counterparts in Blackpool.
John Greenbank, trading standards area manager north, said: “I have worked for trading standards for many years and have never seen anything like this.
“The hotel management clearly thinks that they have come up with a novel way to prevent bad reviews. However, we believe this could be deemed an unfair trading practice.”
Councillor John McCreesh said: “Customers need to be free to be honest about the service they’re getting.
“Other customers depend upon it. Hotel owners should focus on getting their service right rather than shutting down aggrieved customers with threats and fines.
“People should have the right to vent their disappointment if a hotel stay did not meet their expectations and should not be prevented from having their say.”
Simon Calder, travel editor at the Independent, told BBC Breakfast the incident was “completely out of order” but added: “I must say, of course, there is an element of you get what you pay for.”
The original review is still currently available on TripAdvisor.

[joeysteele]

Well by imposing the fine, thankfully now removed, they have drawn probably even more attention to the bad review than would have been seen originally.
Serves them right too.

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

Well by imposing the fine, thankfully now removed, they have drawn probably even more attention to the bad review than would have been seen originally.
Serves them right too.

But at the same time they have generated a lot of interest in their hotel...people will stay there to see if it really is that bad. Mission accomplished.

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

But at the same time they have generated a lot of interest in their hotel...people will stay there to see if it really is that bad. Mission accomplished.

Oddly enough,that's true, a Friend has just said she is thinking about going to try it out.
Good point too Vicky.

[MTVN]

Sound like your typical Trip Advisor saddos

[MTVN]

Looking at the hotel on Trip Advisor though it doesn't seem they're doing a very good job of enforcing a no bad reviews policy..

http://www.tripadvisor.co.uk/Hotel_R...e_England.html