FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
CBB13 Celebrity Big Brother 2014 (CBB13) shown January 2014 was won by Jim Davidson. Discuss here. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
26-01-2014, 07:44 AM | #1 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
... ofcourse the Linda was there!
I couldnt believe how biased they were!
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
26-01-2014, 08:56 AM | #2 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
They pointed out that Jim's not being himself in there, which he's already admitted.
Not sure what the problem is here
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
26-01-2014, 01:57 PM | #3 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Me neither.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
26-01-2014, 02:22 PM | #4 | |||
|
||||
Virtual Biscuit Eater
|
The problem for me was Rachel and Kate acted and spoke like regular BOTS panelists giving nothing more than their personal, sensationalist and often mean opinions but under the guise of 'expert psychologists'.
It's not about favourites - i'd have felt the same if they had gone to town on Linda in the same way in the name of 'psychologists'. If they appeared as regular BOTS panelists and said the same things i wouldn't be bothered. Loads of opinionated panelists on there from all sides and it makes the show entertaining. It's just hearing Rachel and Kate's 'regular panelist talk' under the label of 'psychologist/expert' that i took offence to last night. For example : Kate dubbing Jim a liar because he has 'narrow eyes and stiff arms'. Do psychological experts apply that to everybody who has narrow eyes then? Or is she just saying that to discredit Jim? Last edited by Robodog; 26-01-2014 at 02:31 PM. Reason: . |
|||
Reply With Quote |
26-01-2014, 09:02 AM | #5 | ||
|
|||
Remembering Kerry
|
It was a very poor panel and an even worse show,it was all a building up exercise for Linda who the viewers voting had just soundly rejected in a 5 way evection battle.
|
||
Reply With Quote |
26-01-2014, 11:20 AM | #6 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
What can we expect with an all female panel and two co-presenters who have auto cues for just about everything they say? The panel are probably burning their bras right now.
|
||
Reply With Quote |
26-01-2014, 07:56 PM | #7 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
not all of them one had a dick
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
26-01-2014, 11:23 AM | #8 | |||
|
||||
Can I get a witness?
|
Maybe the audience can now wake up to how awful Jim is
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
26-01-2014, 11:45 AM | #9 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
What on the hearsay of a few bitter people?I doubt it, if anything people will support him more.
__________________
RIP Pyramid, Andyman ,Kerry and Lex xx https://www.facebook.com/JamesBulgerMT/?fref=photo "If slaughterhouses had glass walls, most people would be vegetarian" |
|||
Reply With Quote |
26-01-2014, 11:28 AM | #10 | |||
|
||||
Likes cars that go boom
|
Defending a man accused of sexism by accusing an all female panel of feminism?
Imo they were spot on.... couldn't have put it better myself! He does have 2 faces, 'poor me!' and 'who me?' Apart from his beetroot 'merlot me' face obv.... :laugh;
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
26-01-2014, 11:41 AM | #11 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Well, to be fair to Jim, she was just being mean. He has at least two other faces, and she was just taking the piss out of the 'victim' behaviour to get a laugh. I haven't a lot of respect for that woman. I don't like the tone of her comments generally and I didn't think her input was all that helpful to Linda. It's not that great for people to go through life domineering other people into agreeing with them, and kicking off towards people she doesn't like. Linda is currently unemployed and there aren't many workplaces where she'd be allowed to exhibit behaviour like that. If she'd worked in my profession, she'd have been sacked. Last edited by Seraphim; 26-01-2014 at 11:50 AM. |
||
Reply With Quote |
26-01-2014, 11:43 AM | #12 | |||
|
||||
Get it? Got it? Good!
|
Yeah the psychologist woman in particular was obviously a fan of 'The Nolan's', the rubbish she was spouting was hilarious! Love to know where she got her PhD!
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
26-01-2014, 12:06 PM | #13 | |||
|
||||
Likes cars that go boom
|
Quote:
You didn't care for the psychologists tone? That's unfortunate maybe she should adopt rylans screeching tones....or john mccrirricks booming chauvinism? You can't go through life allowing yourself to be manipulated and humiliated, if you need to make a stand do it.... Don't be shouted down by those who make disparaging comments about women in the vain hope of strengthening their argument. Let's leave that to UKIP.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
26-01-2014, 12:15 PM | #14 | |||
|
||||
Virtual Biscuit Eater
|
Quote:
Rachel and Kate are. But they acted and spoke tonight like John and other such regular opinionated panelists. That's the problem. Last edited by Robodog; 26-01-2014 at 12:17 PM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
26-01-2014, 12:31 PM | #15 | |||
|
||||
Likes cars that go boom
|
Quote:
Female professionals offering an opinion shouldn't be castigated and labelled witches and feminists, it's rather silly.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
26-01-2014, 01:15 PM | #16 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
yes Kizzy tell it how it is totally agree
|
||
Reply With Quote |
26-01-2014, 11:30 AM | #17 | |||
|
||||
שטח זה להשכרה
|
I thought the babbling psychologist who said Jim's actions proved that he was a liar, and that the police use this same method to detect liars was particularly out of order. If I was Jim's lawyer I'd have been on the phone...
The panel looked like a ******ing coven. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
26-01-2014, 11:50 AM | #18 | |||
|
||||
Likes cars that go boom
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
26-01-2014, 11:52 AM | #19 | |||
|
||||
Get it? Got it? Good!
|
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
26-01-2014, 11:55 AM | #20 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
|
||
Reply With Quote |
26-01-2014, 11:55 AM | #21 | |||
|
||||
שטח זה להשכרה
|
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
26-01-2014, 01:51 PM | #22 | |||
|
||||
Iconic Symbolic Historic
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
26-01-2014, 11:34 AM | #23 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Same whining every series when something negative is said about the favourite on bots
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
26-01-2014, 11:38 AM | #24 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
They spent 20 minutes or so telling Linda Nolan what she had done wrong then spent another 20 minutes ( the panel) doing what they told Linda she shouldn't have done, are these men haters thick as well as sad? It just made the audience at home support Jim more.
With reference to the content of what the panel were saying and the 'slaying' of Jim. FFS, people, all people have different sides to them. Jim included, he ain't all bad, he ain't all funny, he ain't all miserable, etc, he's just like the rest of them is made up of many different sides and he's shown them all in there. He just doesn't happen to like, ( and most men don't) Nagging women and loud mouthed women and don't get that mixed up with Clever ,erudite women, there is a vast difference. Luisa likes the sound of her own voice and is not used to being challenged, she's a vacuous, self indulgent ,individual with an annoying monotone voice and like all bullies she backs off in the end. |
||
Reply With Quote |
26-01-2014, 11:43 AM | #25 | |||
|
||||
that's Nice
|
that Wasent A bias Episode that was done on porpuse to get the votes in thats what channel 5 dose, have you ever wanted somthing but another person wants it too, but that other person is starting to get onto the fact that you want it, so you have to do somthing to throw them off the scent well thats whats bbbots episode that was, god big brother veiwers have gone so thick.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|