[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Show us the messages then. Wtf is Habbo and why should he not be on Snapchat?

Hopefully he will if there in nothing weird

[bots]

you don't have conversations over an extended period unless you know something about the person you are talking too. Some may not think its odd for a 60 year old to be talking to a 17 year old, but it raises a big red flag with me

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

you don't have conversations over an extended period unless you know something about the person you are talking too. Some may not think its odd for a 60 year old to be talking to a 17 year old, but it raises a big red flag with me

Bearing in mind when the first contact was made Schofield was still pretending to be hetrosexual

[Mitchell]

Originally Posted by parmnion

It don't sit right with me, this is all well before he came out as well.

His fans as well, are old women are they not? We ain't seeing a plethoral of them coming out the woodwork with answered messages.

I see plenty of TikTok’s of his female fans discussing times they’ve met and messaged him online

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

That's great been but they are still at it 3 years later according to the screen grabs.

Its way dodgy

Originally Posted by Cherie

its a bit odd for a 50 plus year old man to be corresponding for 3 years with a young fan,

It's one thing to engage with fans, but for 3 years, at the very best it is very naive of Phil

Imagine Ruth corresponding with a 17 year old boy for 3 years or Eamonn with a 17 year old girl, it wouldn't sit right and even if there is nothing untoward going on

Do we know it was "for 3 years"? Or simply that the first message was 2017 and the last one 2020? They could have literally had 2 or 3 conversations in that time.

[Mitchell]

I saw the Tiktok yesterday, and it’s mainly along the lines of ‘do you and Holly go out together’ and happy birthday, although as above, if it is anything dodgy, throw the book

[Beso]

Originally Posted by Mitchell

I see plenty of TikTok’s of his female fans discussing times they’ve met and messaged him online

How old are these females?

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Do we know it was "for 3 years"? Or simply that the first message was 2017 and the last one 2020? They could have literally had 2 or 3 conversations in that time.

I am going on what has been claimed in the OP

[Mitchell]

Originally Posted by parmnion

How old are these females?

I wouldn’t like to speculate, but old enough to be Oli’s mother

[AnnieK]

The guy who posted the screenshots has said he is just a fan who got replies from Philip 3 or 4 times over 3 years....nothing to see here

[Liam-]

Funny isn’t it, nobody ever accused him of being a fiddler until he came out, but suddenly he’s a letch pawing over young boys? The blatant homophobia is nauseating

[Jordan.]

Originally Posted by AnnieK

The guy who posted the screenshots has said he is just a fan who got replies from Philip 3 or 4 times over 3 years....nothing to see here

As always people are dumb enough to fall for sensationalism or at least they pretend to...

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by Liam-

Funny isn’t it, nobody ever accused him of being a fiddler until he came out, but suddenly he’s a letch pawing over young boys? The blatant homophobia is nauseating

What's funny is before he came out , I think some people thought he fancied Holly . Now all of a sudden the narrative is he's a 'pervert after young lads' .

We haven't even seen what the actual messages say , but as usual people think the worst . And I'm not even a Schofield fan either.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by AnnieK

The guy who posted the screenshots has said he is just a fan who got replies from Philip 3 or 4 times over 3 years....nothing to see here

I recall that was a well used excuse from Jimmy Saville

[AnnieK]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

I recall that was a well used excuse from Jimmy Saville

Well considering its not from Philip but from the guy who posted the screenshots, what's your point? He obviously did it for likes and then people who love an unsubstantiated allegation ran with it so he clarified what actually happened and now your likening him to Saville? A stretch at best

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by AnnieK

Well considering its not from Philip but from the guy who posted the screenshots, what's your point? He obviously did it for likes and then people who love an unsubstantiated allegation ran with it so he clarified what actually happened and now your likening him to Saville? A stretch at best

His victims thought they were fans, bamboozled by fame and grooming - he made them feel special.

chilling

(not saying phil is a paedo but its very convcerning)

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Cherie

I am going on what has been claimed in the OP

The OP is making several wild accusations with no proof.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

What's funny is before he came out , I think some people thought he fancied Holly . Now all of a sudden the narrative is he's a 'pervert after young lads' .

We haven't even seen what the actual messages say , but as usual people think the worst . And I'm not even a Schofield fan either.

This.

The internet was swarming with "Schofield drooling over Holly makes my skin crawl" type comments and now he's come out as gay suddenly he likes young boys. People are sickening.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

I recall that was a well used excuse from Jimmy Saville

Using Jimmy Saville as a source of humour?

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Using Jimmy Saville as a source of humour?

if you see humour in what i posted then im afraid i would worry for you

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

if you see humour in what i posted then im afraid i would worry for you

I don't see humour. I see your attempt at humour. Extremely poor one at that.

Unless you're now suggesting it was a serious comment, which makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. Are you going to string up all the grown adult celebrities who respond to simple questions from their teenage fans on social media and accuse them all of paedophilia without a shred of proof?

[AnnieK]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

His victims thought they were fans, bamboozled by fame and grooming - he made them feel special.

chilling

(not saying phil is a paedo but its very convcerning)

The guy has said, he was a fan, Phil responded a few times, nothing untoward or even slightly obtuse, he was literally just bigging himself up by saying a celeb was on his TikTok. Just the usual media who love to slam people have made an issue of it. Comparing an apparent innocent exchange between a fan and celeb to a sexual deviant like saville is pretty low in all honesty. His victims were actual victims of horrific crimes....likening an exchange on social media to what they went through at his hands is belittling their experience.

[Crimson Dynamo]

top comment:

amit7 Twickenham, london, United Kingdom, about 4 hours ago

59 - 17 ???? Doesn't look good !!

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by AnnieK

The guy has said, he was a fan, Phil responded a few times, nothing untoward or even slightly obtuse, he was literally just bigging himself up by saying a celeb was on his TikTok. Just the usual media who love to slam people have made an issue of it. Comparing an apparent innocent exchange between a fan and celeb to a sexual deviant like saville is pretty low in all honesty. His victims were actual victims of horrific crimes....likening an exchange on social media to what they went through at his hands is belittling their experience.

Spot on Annie.

[Jordan.]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

I don't see humour. I see your attempt at humour. Extremely poor one at that.

Unless you're now suggesting it was a serious comment, which makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. Are you going to string up all the grown adult celebrities who respond to simple questions from their teenage fans on social media and accuse them all of paedophilia without a shred of proof?

Originally Posted by AnnieK

The guy has said, he was a fan, Phil responded a few times, nothing untoward or even slightly obtuse, he was literally just bigging himself up by saying a celeb was on his TikTok. Just the usual media who love to slam people have made an issue of it. Comparing an apparent innocent exchange between a fan and celeb to a sexual deviant like saville is pretty low in all honesty. His victims were actual victims of horrific crimes....likening an exchange on social media to what they went through at his hands is belittling their experience.

Clocked it appears