[ange7]

Originally Posted by flamingGalah!

For the 20 th time Angie I don't care that he swore on TV, it doesn't bother or offend me in the slightest...

I was replying to Jack's remark that swearing should be allowed on daytime TV & that we are overly PC in not allowing ******* to be said on daytime TV...

I was merely pointing out that swearing on TV in general should only be allowed after 9pm as children shouldn't hear it...

So well done in trying to wind me up but you were very much mistaken in what I was saying on this thread, I couldn't care less what John James said...

lol ..."trying to wind you up". People who disagree with you have "ulterior motives" and want to bait you. zzzzzzz
Sorry mate... I just disagree with you because.... your wrong and seem unable to argue your own point. No need to question my motives for having a different opinion from yours.... more sad deflecting.

[flamingGalah!]

Originally Posted by ange7

lol ..."trying to wind you up". People who disagree with you have "ulterior motives" and want to bait you. zzzzzzz
Sorry mate... I just disagree with you because.... your wrong and seem unable to argue your own point. No need to question my motives for having a different opinion from yours.... more sad deflecting.

Wow, you really didn't even read any of what I wrote did you?!

I was saying that what I had commented on had NOTHING to do with John James... I was refering to Jack's comments about censorship on TV...

What exactly am I wrong about?? Do you think swearing should be allowed on British TV before the watershed?? As that was the point I was raising, nothing to do with John James, just in general...

YOU then assumed I was irrate at what John James had said... I wasn't...

So you jumped to the wrong conclusion & decided to attack for me for mistakingly thinking I was having a dig at your precious John James & when shown you were wrong YOU then deflect it... LOL!!!!

Angie you are priceless... how sweet & sad at the same time...

[ange7]

Originally Posted by flamingGalah!

Wow, you really didn't even read any of what I wrote did you?!

I was saying that what I had commented on had NOTHING to do with John James... I was refering to Jack's comments about censorship on TV...

What exactly am I wrong about?? Do you think swearing should be allowed on British TV before the watershed?? As that was the point I was raising, nothing to do with John James, just in general...

YOU then assumed I was irrate at what John James had said... I wasn't...

So you jumped to the wrong conclusion & decided to attack for me for mistakingly thinking I was having a dig at your precious John James & when shown you were wrong YOU then deflect it... LOL!!!!

Angie you are priceless... how sweet & sad at the same time...

what is wrong with you?
I agree with Jack. Dear me!! .... is it soooo hard to believe that I could disagree with you? lol

[flamingGalah!]

Originally Posted by ange7

what is wrong with you?
I agree with Jack. Dear me!! .... is it soooo hard to believe that I could disagree with you? lol

What is wrong with you?? You realise I wasn't getting my knickers in a twist over John James so you now decide to change your argument!! LOL Angie you are a card...